Painting: Simeon’s Inspired Declaration

Image

“For Revelation and For Glory”
oil painting by Scott Freeman, 30 x 40″, private collection

In keeping with my previous post on Christian-Jewish relations, this week I’m sharing a painting commission that touches on the topic. The couple who commissioned this painting took an active part in its development, which is part of the fun of commissioning an original painting.

The male half of this couple is an avid climber, so I suggested that he might have a particular mountain or view that might serve as the motif for the painting. Also, since I knew these people were lovers of the Judeo-Christian scriptures, I suggested that they might have a favorite passage that could be the inspiration for the painting.

They liked the latter idea and chose a passage from the gospel of Luke that depicts what is traditionally called “the presentation in the Temple.” This account describes Mary and Joseph bringing the infant Jesus to the Temple in Jerusalem in order to fulfill the circumcision and purification requirements of the Torah, following the birth of a firstborn male. Luke states:

“…And it had been revealed to [Simeon] by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. And he came in the Spirit into the temple, and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the Torah, he took him up in his arms and blessed God and said,


‘Lord, now you are letting your servant depart in peace,
according to your word;
for my eyes have seen your salvation
that you have prepared in the presence of all peoples,
a light for revelation to the Gentiles,
and for glory to your people Israel.’

And his father and mother marveled at what was said about him…” (Luke 2:26-33)

There’s a lot packed into those few sentences. We see that Jesus and His family are Jewish and fully Torah-observant under the Mosaic Covenant. We see that they are apparently a poor family as they offer doves, which is the sacrifice allowed for poor families. We see that the old man Simeon was in a state of expectation, as were many during the time period of the second Temple under Rome. But Simeon had even more than the word of the prophets to go on. It says the Holy Spirit had somehow shown him that he would not die before seeing “the Lord’s Christ.” What does this phrase mean?

“Christ” means anointed. The “Lord’s Christ” means God’s anointed one. In the Hebrew scriptures, leaders would be anointed with oil, symbolically setting them apart for a special purpose. By the time of Simeon, there was an understanding that the Hebrew scriptures foretold a specific anointed person who would bring about the redemption of Israel – “the Christ.” (Examples: Jn 4:25,26; 7:31; Mt 22:42; Lu 23:39.) Simeon had received a promise that he would see this Messiah-savior.

Notice Simeon’s somewhat surprising description of the Lord’s Christ: “A light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to your people Israel.”

Now compare his words to what you see in the world today. Would you say that Jesus has become these things to gentiles? To Jews?

My guess is most of us would say that the “light for revelation to the gentiles” part has become true a million times over. Many of us would say it’s personally true for us. I certainly would. And, of course, some 2000 years after His death and resurrection, the religion that has developed around the person of Jesus is the largest in the world. Furthermore, many would argue that, where the news of this Christ has gone, “light” has followed. (One example.)

But what about the second part – “for glory to your people Israel?” Who would argue that this is true today? In defense of the Bible I wish I could argue that since Jesus came from Israel, He is therefore a glory to Israel. But that argument rings a bit hollow to me for a couple of reasons:
1) The vast majority of Jews today and throughout church history have viewed Jesus as a pretender and a false messiah, and
2) for the great majority of church history, the church has allowed Israel zero legitimacy; certainly allowing nothing that could be called “glory”.

In fact, with the gentilization of the church, early church fathers began re-interpreting the Hebrew scriptures through a “Christian” lens so that even old covenant figures like Abraham and Moses were no longer considered Jewish, but Christian! Jesus was essentially taken away from Israel. Added to this was the insistence, during much of church history, that a Jew converting to Christianity repudiate any identity with Judaism at all, making the separation total. Following is an excerpt from a baptismal confession for Jewish converts. Other such documents have survived as well:

‘AS a preliminary to his acceptance as a catechumen, a Jew ‘ must confess and denounce verbally the whole Hebrew people, and forthwith declare that with a whole heart and sincere faith he desires to be received among the Christians. Then he must renounce openly in the church all Jewish superstition, the priest saying, and he, or his sponsor if he is a child, replying in these words:

‘I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms, unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews, and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspersions, purifications, sanctifications and propitiations, and fasts, and new moons, and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants and observances and synagogues, and the food and drink of the Hebrews; in one word, I renounce absolutely everything Jewish, every law, rite and custom…and thus, with my whole heart, and soul, and with a true faith I come to the Christian Faith. But if it be with deceit and with hypocrisy, and not with a sincere and perfect faith and a genuine love of Christ, but with a pretence to a be Christian that I come, and if afterwards I shall wish to deny and return to Jewish superstition, or shall be found eating with Jews, or feasting with them, or secretly conversing and condemning the Christian religion instead of openly confuting them and condemning their vain faith, then let the trembling of Cain and the leprosy of Gehazi cleave to me, as well as the legal punishments to which I acknowledge myself liable. And may I be anathema in the world to come, and may my soul be set down with Satan and the devils’
( B: Profession of Faith, from The Church of Constantinople,
From Assemani, Cod. Lit., 1, p. 105. – from a medieval Greek catechism)

Heart breaking. Not much room for glory to Israel there. This is a cartoonishly divisive departure from the Bible, written by non-Jews who believed they were honoring God and obeying His Word! For these reasons I have to conclude that the world has yet to see Simeon’s “for glory to your people Israel” part of the prophecy.

Am I suggesting that the religions of Judaism and Christianity are one and the same? No. They are not. I am suggesting that, according to the Bible, religion is the wrong paradigm for understanding what God has accomplished for us in His Messiah. What He has accomplished is a better relationship. “The Lord’s Christ” never told anyone to create a new, distinct religion around Him. He did not tell his disciples to go and preach “the Christian religion.”

Search for yourself – the linear, unfolding, progressive revelation of the Bible advocates something far better and deeper than a string of divisive, man-made religions. God’s Messiah preached something called the “kingdom of God”, and made possible a new relationship with God as sons and daughters that only arrived with the Messiah’s New Covenant. In this scenario, Israel has an irrevocable place according to the apostle Paul (Ro 11:11,24,26-29.)

For those interested in studying this topic, Christian, Jew, or otherwise, here are some key places to start: Luke 24:24-53; Roman ch 11; 2 Corinthians ch 3; Galatians ch 3-4:7; Hebrews ch 8.

In closing, I hold up the couple who commissioned this painting as one microcosm of what can be. She was raised by Presbyterian Christian missionaries in Africa. He was raised in a non-observfant Jewish home in California. Today they are united in marriage, a Jew and a gentile Christian. Their children understand the Jewish roots of their faith in Jesus and embrace the unity of the whole of scripture. For the past few Easter/Passover seasons, my family has celebrated Passover with them in full recognition that God’s Messiah has come, fulfilling – not obliterating – everything that was written in the Torah and the prophets. This truth excites everyone present, both Jew and gentile. In the end, it’s all about love and unity between God and man, and between man and man – a unity that God has created in His Messiah (Eph 2:11-16; Matt 22:36-40.)

Love rules.

Image

4 comments on “Painting: Simeon’s Inspired Declaration

  1. Another paradigm for grasping Scott’s excellent article that has been of great help to me is that of “Story.” I look upon the pages of Scripture as a long narrative with five parts to it. Part 1 is creation, Part 2 catastrophe (the rebellion of mankind), and Part 3 is covenants. This is where Israel comes in. In the “covenants” part we find God making a covenant with Abraham, with Israel, and with David. He also promises a great fulfillment of these covenants through the prophets. Part 4 is Christ when the fulfillment is inaugurated and Part 5 is Church. I almost hate to use the word “Church”, especially in the context of this conversation – but it is familiar to us and, after all, it does conveniently start with “C.”

    My point is that the rejection of “all things Jewish” is to rip out a key component of the development of the Story. We cannot grasp Parts 4 & 5 apart from Parts 1-3 and especially 3. Who would think of doing away with The Two Towers, Part 2 of LOTR, once Aragorn is crowned king in Return of the King? It would be hard to grasp the develop from Volume 1 of LOTR and go straight to Volume 3. Also, once Aragorn was crowned king, he did not have to go back to Rohan and try to muster the riders of the Riddermark to come to his aid. That was finished, and he could enter into his reign and bring peace to Gondor and all of Middle Earth. But not to recognize the timely and significant contribution to his reign as described in Volume 2 would have been foolish.

    In the same way, the Bible is a Story with a developing plot that unfolds in each new Act or Chapter. To understand it, and to understand where we are today, we must understand the earlier Chapters or Acts in the Great Drama. If we do not, or if we reject them, then we run the risk of misinterpreting Part 4 and Part 5. Church History is filled with misinterpretation because the earlier parts were rejected or misunderstood. That opened the door to a foreign storyline to be placed on top of Scripture so that it was viewed from an unbiblical perspective – such as the storyline of Gnosticism.

    We need to quit ripping the “Chapters” out of the story and appreciate each one for its contribution to the Great Story and to the Great Climax that has occurred in the death and resurrection of Israel’s Messiah which paved the way for the good news of the kingdom to go to all the nations – including the nation of Israel.

    Thank you Scott for your article – also, your painting isn’t bad either! 😉 – Jonathan Williams

    • Thanks for your kind words and enlightening comments, Jonathan.
      I love that you use Gnosticism as an example of a storyline that has been imposed upon the Bible, since there many people claiming that these “other gospels” were suppressed, and should have been part of the canon. But Gnosticism is so out of place with the story of the Bible! Jesus & the apostles were all about fulfilling, revealing, & explaining mysteries that had been hidden from prior generations (Ro 16:25-27.) Gnosticism was all about funny hats & secret handshakes.

      I’m curious as to why you would prefer not to use the word “church”, and what you would like to use instead if the “c” problem wasn’t an issue. This interests me because my attempts at finding the etymology of the word “church” haven’t been very satisfying.

  2. Trisha Davault says:

    Scott, I just read your blog and I have to say I loved it as much as your painting.
    Sadly it’s true, so much has been misunderstood in terms of solid exegesis. I came across a biblical scholar whose work we follow now,(a pastor friend of ours, sent us his book “Unseen Realm,”several years ago). His PhD’s are in Hebrew and Greek, w Masters in Ancient History, and various other languages,ie. His goal is to put the ancient Israelite in our head, so we can see the biblical narrative through their eyes. His work, will present some views we pushed back on initially, but as we read through his material, he’s so solid. Gods Word comes together in such depth we miss in the lens of 21st century Western Christianity. His book took 15 yrs to write, and has over 6,200 pieces of peer reviewed scholarship behind it.
    He has a podcast titled The Naked Bible Podcast, the title means, with all the traditions, and denominational filters removed. Strictly, what does The Bible teach from its original manuscripts and languages, and to the people it was written to. It wasn’t written to us but also for us.
    All of his work is peer reviewed, if you’re interested, I’d start at new to Dr Heiser’s material, there’s a couple things he’ll introduce titled Divine Council Worldview, DCW and Divine Geography DG.
    The reason I’m mentioning this is, your views on the Jewish people, and having to recant the law, and all their “myths” is heart crushing. I’ve never heard anyone get it more right that Heiser. I listened to one of his podcasts this week, and he interviewed a guy, Seth Postell, and introduced his new book, “Reading Moses, Seeing Jesus.” It’s a great interview, one you may appreciate. nakedbiblepodcast.com it’s episode 371 if you’re interested. I love your work and the passion behind your words as well. Thanks Scott!
    Blessings! ~ Trisha

Please share your thoughts...